logo



Психологические методы подбора и оценки персонала HR-Лаборатория Human Technologies
Экспертные системы и тесты для специалистов и организаций
Обратная связь
test@ht.ru
(495) 514-3115
(495) 669-6719
Главная О компании Контакты Техподдержка HT-Line


     
         

Rambler's Top100

Яндекс цитирования

Яндекс.Метрика


360-degree feedback
PURPOSE
 
360-degree feedback approximates evaluations received by an employee from the people he or she is working with. The feedback can come from all around the employee – from managers, peers, subordinates, customers, suppliers, as well as self-assessment. Employee’s professional behavior is evaluated with the use of a number of predefined criteria.

Attention! 360-degree feedback is recommended for mature organizations with stable organizational structure that have already implemented other human resources management methods. The participants of multisource feedback are supposed to know about professional activities of each other and to work together for at least 0,5-1 year.

Strong points of 360-degree feedback method:
  • Information about real professional behavior;
  • Possibility to choose different evaluation criteria;
  • Simple and quick implementation;
  • Delivering the employees a sense of the importance of their opinion for the leadership.
Weak points of 360-degree feedback are subjectivity of the evaluations and possible resistance of the employees. However these shortcomings could be overcome by competent instruction and check for the similarity of the expert judgments. This is possible with the automation of 360-degree feedback.

OUR ADVANTAGES

HR-Lab uses original web-tool for collecting multi-rater feedback. The application could be accessed through Internet or could be installed in customer’s local net.
  • The application has an embedded mailing program that creates hyperlinks for individual survey pages for all participants of the assessment procedure.
  • HR-specialist controlling the assessment process can observe the data collection online thus finding out which employees have already received enough evaluations for creating the final report and which employees have not made their judgments yet and have to be reminded about the deadline of the assessment.
  • The application checks for the similarity of the expert judgments. The removal of the evaluations most dissimilar with the rest ones helps to overcome subjectivity effects due to emotional reasons or expert’s lack of information. This allows for the essential increase of the results trustworthiness.
  • The application approximates the data automatically.
  • The application can be used to create a wide range of reports (individual and group reports, various ratings including check for the similarity to the ideal profile).


WORK DESCRIPTION

A step by step project creation wizard will guide you through the project creation process.

Step 1 – Defining user criteria set.

The defined criteria can be combined into competency systems determining optimal competence evidence and criterion weight in the given evaluation system.

Step 2 – Listing participants of the assessment.

The participant information card consists of employee name, department in which he or she is working, and e-mail that will be used in the mailing list.

Other important parameters, such as assessor category (manager, peer, subordinate, etc.), rater instructions, and individual or group assessment plans, are determined in the data editor.

Step 3 – Creating individual assessment plan.

There are two possible ways of defining raters for a participant – this can be either a whole department or specific employees representing corresponding assessor categories. The application automatically creates survey pages for every assessor and emails appropriate hyperlinks according to the emails indicated in the information cards.

Step 4 – Personal survey page (main).

This is a screenshot of the main survey page listing all employees to be evaluated by the rater. After all judgments for a specific employee have been collected, the employee link becomes inactive and in the last table column time and date of protocol saving appears.

Step 5 – Personal survey page (questionnaire).

HR-specialist controlling the assessment process can observe the data collection online.

Step 6 – Assessment control.

The control mode allows monitoring the feedback collection in concern with both assessors and assessees.

The assessment results can be represented in various modes, such as integral respondent ratings (in comparison to averaged estimations or ideal profiles), individual profiles containing appraisals of different assessor categories, and data on the similarity of the expert judgments.

Step 7 – The results of 360 degrees assessment. An example of integral rating comparing the similarity of the individual evaluations with the ideal profile.

The representation mode of individual and group reports can be customized upon request

 
Интересная статья? Поделитесь ей с другими:




Рассылки Subscribe.Ru
Профессиональное психологическое тестирование

busyЗагрузка опроса...
Комментарии к статьям
RSS


          Работа.ру. Хватит на всех